Tuesday, October 25, 2005

Readers n writers

Years ago a colleague suggested that the next time I was at ANU that I go to the library and borrow my PhD thesis so it would have at least one entry in the borrowed sheet attached to the inside cover. I resisted the temptation, largely because it struck me as being pretty silly to borrow something you already had a copy of and of which you were roundly sick to death.

It is something of this urge, "hey is anyone listening?" that prompted me to monitor web pages, blogs to get a sense of visitors, repeat folk (assuming a domain name entry flags a kind of uniqueness), one offs etc. So I find myself doing what I opted not to do so many years ago, checking to see who the heck is at least clicking on this page. Whether they read it or not is entirely another matter and what is conveyed to them when they do read it is equally mysterious. One needs a little mystery in one's life.

It is an odd and largely misrepresented statistic about web writing, "the number of hits", but it provides the writer with at least some sense that there are anonymous "clickers" out there whom, for whatever reason, are drawn to do some clicking on one or more of your pages. Actually, given the distribution and readership of many academic journals, I probably enjoy a wider readership here than via "the stuff that really counts".

Signals

I often think it is a miracle that humans manage to communicate at all other than in ways such as fighting, fleeing or mating. There probably are other primal urges but I did not do PU 101. It's not that we don't try to communicate. We are awash with all manner of signals, texts, stuff that is supposed to convey what is in the mind of one human to the mind of another. In most jobs you rarely have time to think about whether the signal you send is likely to hit the mark (whatever that means). But when you combine our capacity for signalling with our deep need to make sense of much of our world then things get pretty interesting.

There are those who are magnificent signallers. This does not necessarily mean that they signal accurately or in a sophisticated manner, rather that they manage to provoke/evoke responses in large numbers of those who pick up the signal. I'm guessing teaching is a bit like that. Good teachers signal in ways that do provoke/evoke and any other oke's you can think of. People speak of great communicators but i figure that is attributing way too much to the signaller. Good signaller I can agree to. But this tricky C word, like the tricky L word (L for learning) is something that does not bear close scrutiny.

So what we do in the face of all of this. We perform communication, act like it is happening. In fact, we have little to no idea what is going on in the minds around us other than our own and even then we might be suspicious of what the so-called conscious lets us listen in on. We are very good though, most of the time, at "reading" other bodies: thier eyes, hands movements, body positioning and so on. Not an exact science by any means but this is stuff that is rehearsed over and over so we respond without the need to process mcuh other than the signal occurred. The fun part always is when we take our little stock of "readings" and apply them to a person we have never met. Well we have to start somewhere! All such fun. I think I prefer the bounce theory I was writing about some time back.

Sunday, October 23, 2005

Hints

One of the most puzzling and often annoying aspects of the general problem of human communication is when you are trying to tell someone something and they simply don't want to hear it. The converse is also rather annoying, you are not wanting to tell someone something but they are convinced you are. There is much to be said for plain language, i.e. bugger off, rude message following, or no, I don't want to listen to that sound track and if you play it again I may be physically ill. Which is all the more reason to enjoy, celebrate and be thankful to whatever deities float above (or below) for a partner who is as good at reading you as you hope you are at reading her. And no DBR, it's not THAT kind of relationship where one finishes the other's sentence but more of a kind of a sometimes spooky awareness of the other's mood, well being, happiness, angst or whatever. It's like surfing. You don't think, you just feel it and do it. Like many of the good, silky things in life. It's not a head thing, it is something that lies beyond the grasp of stuttering Western Science. It just is. And, as she is fond of reminding me, if it feels good do it. It does feel good.

Nekkid

There is something about doing away with clothing that has always appealed. Swimming sans garments is a joy as is being able to wander about without a stitch. Conventions and whatever hangups have been dutifully passed down from prior generations dictates that such events occur in privacy. But I keep thinking about apes and orangutangs, the pre-hominids, waking up in the morning and Mother ape saying, now don't you go swinging out there unless you've got clean underwear on. You might be run over by an elephant. Somewhere between there and now, we acquired a bunch of weird mindsets about bodies and their covering. One imagines the titillation industries would be broke if this mighty habituation of the human species were done away with tomorrow. The nude bomb has much to offer I suspect. There is always the view that clothing is also a device to help keep Australia beautiful. More media speak. I think clothing ought to return to its purpose: decoration, comfort, and protection (not from prying eyes but from the stuff that can damage skin or cause the body harm).

Friday, October 21, 2005

Back into water

I swam with Steph for the first time in the new pool in Geelong this early am. The body did not like it one bit. The mind kept telling the body it was good for it and to wait a few days for the endorphins or to enjoy the momentary reduction in adrenaline. Either way, there are days when the body, grudgingly celebrates with the mind and this was one of those days. It was also a day for a 16 yo to give a 59 yo a good towelling in just a routine 3k training swim. I don't mind being towelled by Steph. Good for her ego (I think). There are lots of things one can live without, do without and never mind if it was banned but my contact with swimmable or surfable water ain't one of 'em.

Thursday, October 20, 2005

Bouncing balls

There are times in Australian rules when the ball just does not bounce as you want it. Folk talk about having the run of the ball. Life can be a bit like that. Some days it bounces right up into your arms, other days it bounces at right angles away from you, suddenly runs along the ground, sometimes kicks up high and any, all of these movements only serve to make you look pretty silly. Which, when you think of it is probably the meaning of life.

And today, a lovely line from Luciano Pavarotti. He was asked with a preamble about how much he sings about love, "what is love?". His reply, "If I knew what it was, it wouldn't be!'"

Life and love are like that. Hence all the feeble metaphors about what folk think they might be, all the while living metaphors, ways of thinking that bear little resemblance to the announced metaphor.

As I mull, there are lot of terms like that, care, respect, friend, affection, all terms that really should never be measured or defined. Any attempts to do that ends up making you look pretty silly and further removed from simply enjoying the unique pleasures that derive from being human. This is speaking with all the authority of he who once was seal (at least in my dreams).

Tuesday, October 18, 2005

Pulling plugs

There are moments I think when just as you lean back in a nice hot, relaxing bath that someone, or perhaps a freak of nature or whatever, conspires to pull the plug. So you end up sitting there. No water. Covered in suds. Looking quite silly. I guess there are a bunch of options: refill the tub, take a shower, get out and get dried or just stay there and admire the rings you left. There are other less 'logical' options like write an operetta, dictate a memo to your four year old stenographer, paint the ceiling with toothpaste or perhaps play lizards on the slippery porcelain. For my part, I guess it depends on good the bath was. Is it worth refilling or do you just say, "hey good bath.... next gig". So DBR that is the question that transcends such trivialities like the meaning of life, the origins of the universe of does god exist and if she does what does she do about pmt?

I think I'll go refill it but it will take time cos the tap is only half on.

Sunday, October 16, 2005

Pride and bear hunts

Some times it is difficult to put in words the complex set of feelings that come together during a moment or event. But yesterday, during the twins 4th birthday, just a whirl of pride, joy and fun as pg did her thing, played the Pied Piper to a seemingly uncontrollable mass of similarly aged children and parents who stood about mostly as parents do when their little ones run wild. It was fun, exhilarating and joyful, entirely due to the energy, wit and funstering of the gf. The bear hunt was a classic. The wee people, who are now not so wee had a ball all day.

Saturday, October 08, 2005

And now for something entirely different

It's insomnia time but that's ok. Odd thing that waves don't get to sleep but I figure with all that pulsing and throbbing it would be enough to keep anything awake. Just musing on the echoes or is it ghosts of the past that frame and condition how we be inna world. I mean what are the things we forget we need to unlearn from old patterns, particularly around relationships. Some of these patterns come from parents. I know when I sit at dinner and clasp my hands, it is almost unconscious but my Dad did that at dinner also. He always had a smile, a thoughtful look. I can recall a sppoky conversation with probably my best friend who pointed out (very gently) all the "habits" I had acquired from Mum and Dad after I had spoken about them.

On a less edifying note, I can recall an ex happily perusing my computer late one night (and, no she was not confronted) and I can recall her recounting how her mother had read her diaries when she was little. No justification. Patterns. Ghosts guiding your head/hand. I am therefore increasingly conscious of all the stuff I do and how the wee people soak it in. Trapped. I know, as a consequence of long time with said ex that I react to silences and what may appear to be but is probably not indifference in ways that were conditioned through fourteen years of dealing with it. And, DBR, I need to add it was not just a silence all round, it was silence to me but joy, engaging, witty, clever, happy conversation to almost anyone else in sight, on phone, over the fence. I recall other relationships that at the time were probably huge in my psyche but are now barely able to be recalled. Who were my emotional shapers? What was the good legacy they left? What was the crap I learned but didn't know I had? Pavlov was probably right.

Trust is a funny thing. People do and they don't. I mean they want to but what would it mean to bare the actual stuff, all the fears, insecurities, uncertainties, all the primal urge stuff. I mean when you pare it all back. All the stuff you feel really bad about and really good about. The stuff which, with the removal of the thin crust of what we glibly call society would emerge brutal, unfeeling and self-serving. I look inside me and shudder, then smile, then laugh out loud. Perhaps the one gift someone gave me was learning never to take any of it seriously. Maybe that is a thank you to a huge string of people past? But, having said all of that we live in a world of surfaces, flows and flaws. We bounce of one another's surfaces and look to see what happens. Bouncing, some call it flirting (I like the line: table manners is to food as flirting is to sex). We repress all of those survival things, those quick judgements that Gladwell writes of (fight, flee, food, mate) and smile and ask how the day is. We have little or no idea what each bounce does to the other and we often spend a lot of time trying to work it out with those bouncees who matter to us.

There is now, or so I read, quite a lot of study of this kind of thing. Folk who can watch a couple interact, talking about the most everyday things and tell them how long their relationship will last. Crude relationship physics. The sad thing is they have some kind of very high success (if that is what you'd call it) rate.

Speaking of bouncees, I am blessed with the most loving person known to human kind. She is such a skilled bouncer. She bounces folk every which way, charms, beguiles, and, occasionally batters. I still don't know how we ever managed to get together. But I can't put inwords how glad I am that we did. I have other bouncees who are less and less readable as they grow, i.e. 6 stunningly gorgeous children. Then there are a lot of other bouncees, some more bouncier than others. Some who pass like billiard balls in the night, barely brushing your surface. Others who leave you asking what the fuck was that? And then you can be a watcher of bounces. Who bounces with whom? How do they bounce? Really hard to notice when bouncing becomes habituated, i.e. a bounce is just like a clock on the wall, a seat by the door, natural, normal.

So, I figure, apart from us bein made of hydrogen, helium and star dust we are, or at least the bipedal sentients (my god how pretentious is the human race?) are bouncers. So the crappiness of the adult space one has to play in from time to time is more usefully seen in terms of bouncing. And when it all gets too hard of people actually, physically bouncing (no DBR not horizontal aerobics). Just imagining a collision of tummys, an ooomphing of guts, a squishing of fatty tissue and then, the look of surprise and oh, um, er, it was only a bounce.

Maybe I need some primal screaming or whatever. Maybe I just need to scream. But what? That the world is a dumb place? That my gen has really left a set of doozey problems for the next? That blogging is probably one of the cheaper forms of mass therapy, that and MOOing. God, have not done that in yonks. Probably all those SLGs (sad n lonely geeks) got me down. But now, having worn off a good chunk of tossing and turning and avoiding doing actual bouncing in bed with the sleeping pg, I will return to her warmth.

Tuesday, October 04, 2005

Endless summer

Ok. So trapped in the surfing thing. But there is a sequence in that old movie where they are surfing a very looooooong wave in Sth Africa and a lot of corny jokes about having breakfast and lunch on the same wave. That's as close as I can get to describing this moment in time. It just keeps going and getting better and I can't see where the wave will stop if ever.

I'd try and commit to no more surfing metaphors but am too trapped in this way of being in the world.